<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The San Carlos Real Estate Week in Review:  9/5/09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whiteoaksblog.com/2009/09/05/the-san-carlos-real-estate-week-in-review-9509/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whiteoaksblog.com/2009/09/05/the-san-carlos-real-estate-week-in-review-9509/</link>
	<description>If it happens in San Carlos, it&#039;s in here...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 23:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.whiteoaksblog.com/2009/09/05/the-san-carlos-real-estate-week-in-review-9509/#comment-7806</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 04:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whiteoaksblog.com/?p=4573#comment-7806</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike,

You&#039;re right.  This home has been off an on the market since August of &#039;08 when it first listed for $1,349,000.   I have featured it on the site a few times during that span.  Since that time, the listing changed brokerages 3 times and it ultimately became an REO.  I didn&#039;t see anything wrong with it, and the person who bought it for $889K ($357/sq ft) did indeed get a good deal.   I used to include the total history for some of these listings, but often times they&#039;re pulled off the market for a short stint and put back on, often times at a reduced price.  That resets the DOM clock back to zero, and in reality it deserves to look like a new listing.  That&#039;s why I don&#039;t include the ancient history anymore, unless it&#039;s an unbroken span of time that it was on the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right.  This home has been off an on the market since August of &#8217;08 when it first listed for $1,349,000.   I have featured it on the site a few times during that span.  Since that time, the listing changed brokerages 3 times and it ultimately became an REO.  I didn&#8217;t see anything wrong with it, and the person who bought it for $889K ($357/sq ft) did indeed get a good deal.   I used to include the total history for some of these listings, but often times they&#8217;re pulled off the market for a short stint and put back on, often times at a reduced price.  That resets the DOM clock back to zero, and in reality it deserves to look like a new listing.  That&#8217;s why I don&#8217;t include the ancient history anymore, unless it&#8217;s an unbroken span of time that it was on the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: transient</title>
		<link>http://www.whiteoaksblog.com/2009/09/05/the-san-carlos-real-estate-week-in-review-9509/#comment-7769</link>
		<dc:creator>transient</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whiteoaksblog.com/?p=4573#comment-7769</guid>
		<description>39 Coronado had a much longer listing history too, starting out at a much higher price. Do you know what the issue was with that place? Seems like the buyer got a great deal on a large house with a view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>39 Coronado had a much longer listing history too, starting out at a much higher price. Do you know what the issue was with that place? Seems like the buyer got a great deal on a large house with a view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.whiteoaksblog.com/2009/09/05/the-san-carlos-real-estate-week-in-review-9509/#comment-7766</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 05:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whiteoaksblog.com/?p=4573#comment-7766</guid>
		<description>Alan,

You&#039;re absolutely correct.  Thanks for catching that -- the numbers are now updated in the post.  I really buggered that one, since I even had the wrong agent as the listing agent too.   Time for a vacation!

Chuck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re absolutely correct.  Thanks for catching that &#8212; the numbers are now updated in the post.  I really buggered that one, since I even had the wrong agent as the listing agent too.   Time for a vacation!</p>
<p>Chuck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Kutach</title>
		<link>http://www.whiteoaksblog.com/2009/09/05/the-san-carlos-real-estate-week-in-review-9509/#comment-7765</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Kutach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 03:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whiteoaksblog.com/?p=4573#comment-7765</guid>
		<description>Offering a correction to the homes that closed this week: 352 Clifton initially listed at $699k (reduced to $659 before going into contract).  The final price of $650k is thus 7% below the original asking price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Offering a correction to the homes that closed this week: 352 Clifton initially listed at $699k (reduced to $659 before going into contract).  The final price of $650k is thus 7% below the original asking price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
